Archive for the ‘social media’ Category

Social Media Policy Failures

Sunday, January 8th, 2012

Social media is seen by many as a panacea to the challenges of “good” customer service; a direct interaction with their customers. Don’t get me wrong, when it is done well, it is an excellent tool to support the organisation, however, on three separate occasions in the last 12 months or so, I have seen some spectacular failures!

As a small organisation, we know what is being said to and by us at anytime, as the organisation grows, the greater the need for external communication to also be disseminated internally. Failure to to so, is actually counterproductive for organisation concerned. Let me demonstrate, by way of example, how not thinking through the communication flow fully, an organisation un-intentionally feeds their most valuable asset, customer facing staff to the hordes!

December 2010, Europe saw some pretty spectacular snow-falls, depending on your age! Most of the continents major airports were shut, for varying periods, days if you were in the UK! I was travelling back from a week in France and Germany, intending to take the first flight out of the local airport, with a major flag carrier, into the UK, with the intention of flying out again on the Monday. Early alarm call and off to the airport, not a lot was moving but they were de-icing our aircraft. A delay was then announced, due to the late inbound arrival of the aircraft the night before, crew duty time. Spending the time catching up on e-mail etc, it became clear that we would not be going anywhere fast. Twitter feeds from the both the destination airport and the Airline, all stated nobody was getting home that day, the local staff and the crew all said we would be boarding in an hour! This confusion, between the centre and front-line staff, was beginning to generate a certain amount of friction between passengers and staff! The staff remained professional and extremely helpful, in the face of some fairly severe questioning. I eventually flew direct to my next assignment, if you are interested.

Recently, Tuesday, in fact returning home from a night out in London, with my family, a meal and show. We were on the train home, arrived Cambridge no issues, with half the Christmas refuse attacking the rail lines, if all the tweets were to be believed! Our train was 45 minutes late leaving for our final destination. There was no solid information from the train crew, just telling us that they hadn’t been advised on reasons behind the delay! The Train Operating Company (TOC) were tweeting that there were signal issues due to the high winds, then we were advised that the train would terminate three stops early due a tree hitting a train. Replacement buses would be provided, however, there was no estimate of their arrival. How was this information presented by the TOC’s staff; they had not a clue! They resorted to patronising the passengers and essentially shrugging their shoulders.

These two incidents were generated by mass transport providers, granted, a TOC will move more people than an airline, at any point in time! I suspect that this market is not alone! What lessons should be learned, here are my thoughts:

  • Always ensure that customer facing staff have the same information, that technology aware customers will have access to; you only have to see the number of smart phones, tablets and mobile enabled laptops to see this is essential.
  • Ensure that staff have access to modern devices, who uses a pager in 2012? Obviously, the TOCs do!
  • Ensure that customer facing staff have the right attitude, nothing is more certain to further erode a companies image than less than professional staff!

The solution is not really rocket science, it requires a combination of:

  • Appropriate and adequate processes, that are reviewed regularly.
  • Regular refresher training, addressing both soft people skills and hard technology updates.
  • A budget for technology, this is not a carte  blanche recommendation to invest in several hundred of world’s most popular tablet, there are a range of options to suit all organisations.

What is important is recognition that an organisation is not a series of “silos”, policy decisions need to be reviewed by all operational divisions. Social media is not the exclusive plaything of the marketers as it appears in a lot of organisations. The agreed policy must ensure that internal and external communication will be matched, otherwise we will see, repeated, at points where the organisation meets the customer the sort of friction described above. It will be happening everyday in every walk of life!

The Rugby World Cup and Aircraft Deliveries!

Wednesday, October 12th, 2011

Probably not two activities that you think would be linked in any way; but there is a link – commercialism!

 There are similarities:

  •  Both are subject to globally agreed regulations, EASA, FAA and the IRB
  • Both are seeing the accepted regulations circumvented by commercial pressures

Let me set the scenarios.

I referee and coach youth rugby, colts, in particular. I have been watching this year’s world cup with enjoyment, tinged with disappointment that Scotland came home before the quarter finals for the first time, and a growing sense of frustration that the Laws of the Game (LofG) have been hi-jacked at this elite level by the needs of television, or commercialism. I am faced on a Sunday morning with boys, coaches and parents who complain because I apply the LotG, as they are written down and not in the way they are shown on television. The commercialism of television coverage wants the ball to continually be in play and rewards the team in possession; television does not want the tactical nuances of the game, because they are not appealing to a mass market.

I know that next week, next month and next year I will have the same discussions with players, coaches and parents over interpretations about the contact area; I will receive letters and directions through our referees society instructing us to apply the LotG and yet live rugby on the television will not reflect the game I have to deal with on a Sunday morning.

So where is commercialisation distorting airworthiness regulations, how are regulations overseeing safe commercial flying operations being circumvented? We all know that aircraft are assembled with a range of components, those requiring scheduled maintenance interventions and those that do not require any maintenance actions, except when they fail. They are then routed through an appropriate back-shop and released back into service. They will be issued with an applicable release certificate; an EASA Form 1, F8130 or equivalent. The release paperwork will be completed in accordance with an approved company procedure derived from the international standards. The release paperwork will contain the legally required information for that component as defined by the Vendor.

I have seen a lessor saying that for on-condition components, that is not enough; the lessor wants to know the date of manufacture, hours and cycles consumed. The fact that it is an on-condition item, it is not necessary for the overhaul facility to detail the utilisation or hours consumed; if it is on a second or subsequent shop visit the data may not be available.  The airline is then required to spend time and effort either trying to identify the utilisation or replacing the component with one that has got all the utilisation data available.

The lessor’s rational is that the average age of all the components fitted should be less than the age of the aircraft. If that was the case, with a new aircraft on the first lease transfer, all components changed during its service with the airline should have come from the fleet leader, and there should be a disproportionally high number of on-condition components changed. With the logistics systems being what they are this would not happen a proportion of components will be new items. When discussing this with the lessor, their default position is, read and understand the lease you have signed! This can be difficult when an airline is purchasing spares from a range of suppliers under a range of conditions, from scheduled maintenance through to AOG!

What does it mean for the future? The regulators, the IRB, EASA and the FAA must either:

  • Stand-up and say there is no need to amend the current regulations and ensure that there is not this erosion of regulations, or;
  • Amend the regulations to reflect the new reality; to do this they must tell those of us affected by the changes why they are changing.

In either case it will result in higher costs for the airline(s); there will be perfectly acceptable, from a regulatory standpoint, components that can not be able to be fitted, there will be a requirement for changed processes and an increased number of new items. Airlines not being charities, costs will have to be passed on, to you and I. For me, on a Sunday morning I will continue to be questioned by boys, coaches and parents who do not understand the difference between entertainment and sport!

As always I look forward to your thoughts!

Help For Heros

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

You may not know, I spent many years serving in the Royal Air Force, both as an airman and finishing my career as an Engineering Officer. I have been out of uniform for 11 years now, though for a number of years, I was supporting the military from the other side of the fence.  For the last 10 years of my service I was actively involved in appointments directly supporting operations, split between the former Yugoslavia and the enforcement of the no-fly zones over Iraq amongst other smaller humanitarian operations.

(more…)

University or Further Education?

Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

I think that this might be a little controversial and will hopefully spark some debate! I will state up front that I am an indentured apprentice with 6 years productive employment before going to university, gaining a BEng in Aerosystems Engineering, my career since then has been involved management, including establishing and running Mackenzie Morgan. My primary area of expertise is airworthiness management and all that that involves. I believe in the value of a university education.

(more…)

Business Contingency Planning

Thursday, April 22nd, 2010

As I sit here waiting to fly home, I thought that I would review how we have coped as a business with the enforced stay in Bahrain, is there anything that Mackenzie Morgan can do better or differently to ensure that our business successfully continues! Incidentally, there was an excellent programme on the BBC World Service earlier in the week  on the same topic, it is due to be repeated catch it if you can! (more…)