Comments on: Airworthiness Decisions – Who Benefits? http://www.mackenzie-morgan.com/index.php/airworthiness-decisions-who-benefits/ “Innovation, integrity and the highest standards of delivery in airworthiness management wherever you need it globally„ Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:51:54 +0000 hourly 1 By: Malcolm Cox http://www.mackenzie-morgan.com/index.php/airworthiness-decisions-who-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-53 Malcolm Cox Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:31:06 +0000 http://mackenzie-morgan.com/?p=518#comment-53 Oussama Thanks for your supportive comments! I agree, the "one-stop-shop" will not compromise the airworthiness status of the aircraft, it is just that the operators bottom line will be affected! Interface procedures and the use of technology will ease the management burden on the operator. Regards Malcolm Oussama

Thanks for your supportive comments!

I agree, the “one-stop-shop” will not compromise the airworthiness status of the aircraft, it is just that the operators bottom line will be affected! Interface procedures and the use of technology will ease the management burden on the operator.

Regards

Malcolm

]]> By: Oussama http://www.mackenzie-morgan.com/index.php/airworthiness-decisions-who-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-52 Oussama Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:32:38 +0000 http://mackenzie-morgan.com/?p=518#comment-52 There is a good argument for Operators contracting their maintenance including their planning and engineering including analysis of airworthiness requirements (be it ADs or repetitive defects) to one service provider an MRO in this case. The pitfall here, is the fact that the MRO may make decisions that are favorable to its business needs which may not be in the best business interest of the operator. The airworthiness status of the aircraft not being jeopardized in any case. Contracting the services with an independent organisation will give the operator the ability to make decisions more attuned to its business needs, without of course jeopardizing airworthiness. Such an arrangement will have a higher work load in terms of the operator implementing their airworthiness decisions in a timely and efficient manner but will provide a better result in terms of savings and availability of the aircraft. There is a good argument for Operators contracting their maintenance including their planning and engineering including analysis of airworthiness requirements (be it ADs or repetitive defects) to one service provider an MRO in this case. The pitfall here, is the fact that the MRO may make decisions that are favorable to its business needs which may not be in the best business interest of the operator. The airworthiness status of the aircraft not being jeopardized in any case.

Contracting the services with an independent organisation will give the operator the ability to make decisions more attuned to its business needs, without of course jeopardizing airworthiness. Such an arrangement will have a higher work load in terms of the operator implementing their airworthiness decisions in a timely and efficient manner but will provide a better result in terms of savings and availability of the aircraft.

]]>